This page contains a supplementary material for the paper:
M. Królikowska and P.A. Dybczyński, 2016,
New orbit recalculations of comet C/1890 F1 Brooks
and its dynamical evolution
published in MNRAS:
https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-abstract/460/3/2905/2609485/New-orbit-recalculations-of-comet-C-1890-F1-Brooks?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Please quote our paper if you use this data.


Each section title consists of Strömgren number of observation, epoch of observation in TT and the MPC code of the observer

41 1890 Mar. 30.1426 533

Strömgren proposed to increase the moment of observation by 1 hour, accepted.

42 1890 Mar. 30.1426 533

Strömgren proposed to increase the moment of observation by 1 hour, accepted.

64 1890 Apr. 2.4082 787

Strömgren proposed to increase Δα by 1s, not accepted.

65 1890 Apr. 2.4082 787

Strömgren proposed to increase Δα by 1s, not accepted.

68 1890 Apr. 3.4154 787

Strömgren proposed to decrease Δδ by 1', accepted.

104 1890 Apr. 20.2647 787

Strömgren proposed to increase the moment of observation by 3 hours, accepted.

105 1890 Apr. 20.2647 787

Strömgren proposed to increase the moment of observation by 3 hours, accepted.

163 1890 May 7.9796 522

Strömgren proposed to change a sign of Δδ, accepted.

201 1890 May 15.9319 0

We propose to use Δδ = +8 02 due to inconsistency in the original paper.

225 1890 May 17.0181 537

Strömgren proposed to decrease Δδ by 1' but we increased Δδ by 1'.

245 1890 May 18.3149 794

Strömgren proposed to decrease the moment of observation by 1 hour, accepted.

269 1890 May 20.9057 0

Strömgren proposed to decrease Δδ by 5 min but instead we used a different reference star.

275 1890 May 21.3030 794

We used different reference star.

280 1890 May 21.9095 548

Strömgren proposed to increase Δα by 3s and to change sign of Δδ. Instead we increased the moment of observation by 15 minutes.

283 1890 May 21.9384 14

We used a different reference star.

287 1890 May 22.8170 85

Strömgren proposed to increase Δδ by 20", not accepted.

295 1890 May 22.9016 528

We corrected the published apparent comet position by 10s in α.

296 1890 May 22.9085 0

We added a new reference star for this observation.

301 1890 May 22.9450 528

We corrected Δδ from +4 47.0 to +0 47.0 as a result of an inconsistency in the original paper.

309 1890 May 23.0250 526

Strömgren proposed to increase the moment of observation by 1 hour, accepted.

312 1890 May 23.0636 999

We corrected Δδ by 30" suspecting a typo in the original paper.

320 1890 May 23.9323 999

Strömgren decreased declination by 3', accepted.

322 1890 May 23.9539 4

Strömgren proposed to decrease Δα by 6s, accepted.

328 1890 May 24.9288 582

We decreased the published, apparent comet position by 5' suspecting a typo in the original paper.

331 1890 May 24.9422 45
419 1890 June 10.9189 45
544 1890 July 16.9088 45
512 1890 July 9.9661 45

Strömgren proposed to apply corrections to declinations as a result of a comment published in: AN, volume 127,1891, page 331, and we accepted all proposed changes.
For observation 331 Strömgren increased Δδ by 19.8"
For observation 419 Strömgren decreased Δδ by 9.9"
For observation 512 Strömgren decreased Δδ by 9.9"
For observation 544 Strömgren decreased Δδ by 19.8"

346 1890 May 26.8686 135

We increased the moment of observation by 10 min.

358 1890 May 27.9137 0

We corrected published apparent comet position by 10s.

360 1890 May 28.1722 794

Strömgren proposed to decrease the moment of observation by 1 hour, accepted.

361 1890 May 28.8216 85

Strömgren proposed to change a sign of Δα, accepted.

372 1890 May 30.9120 999

Strömgren proposed to change a sign of Δδ, accepted.

385 1890 June 1.0409 8

We decreased the moment of observation by 10 min.

411 1890 June 8.9847 516

We corrected Δδ by 1' suspecting an error in the original paper.

426 1890 June 12.9182 89

Strömgren proposed to change a sign of Δδ, accepted.

434 1890 June 16.9400 999

Strömgren proposed to decrease Δδ by 2', accepted.

445 1890 June 22.8423 89

Strömgren proposed to change a sign of Δδ, accepted.

450 1890 June 24.8695 14

Strömgren proposed to increase Δα by 1 min, accepted.

458 1890 June 26.1703 802

We increased the published apparent comet position by 1' suspecting a typo in the original paper.

472 1890 June 27.9342 0

We changed a sign of Δα due to the inconsistency in the original paper.

477 1890 June 29.567737 787

Strömgren proposed to increase δ by 4', accepted.

517 1890 July 12.8487 85

Strömgren proposed to change a sign of Δα, accepted.

548 1890 July 17.8685 14

Strömgren proposed to change a sign of Δδ, accepted.

557 1890 July 20.8595 85

Strömgren proposed to change a sign of Δδ, accepted.

558 1890 July 20.9126 135

Strömgren proposed to increase Δδ by 2', accepted.

561 1890 July 21.9602 999

Strömgren proposed to increase Δα o 5 min but instead we changed a sign of Δα.

582 1890 Aug. 3.9469 999

Strömgren proposed to increase the date of observation by 2 days, accepted.

587, 588, 589, 620, 62l, 622, 680, 681, 682, 686, 687, 689, 690.

Strömgren proposed to apply time corrections published in MNRAS, vol.51, page 154, 1891, accepted.

590 1890 Aug. 5.8751 135

We increased Δδ by 5'.

611 1890 Aug. 13.8354 135

We used a different reference star.

645 1890 Aug. 23.8311 85

Strömgren proposed to decrease Δα by 30", accepted.

648 1890 Sep. 1.2094 662

We corrected a published apparent comet position in α by 6s suspecting a typo in the original paper.

660 1890 Sep. 9.0779 802

We corrected a published apparent comet position in δ by 4' due to the inconsistency in the original paper.

689 1890 Sep. 15.8674 0
690 1890 Sep. 15.8674 0

We decreased the moments of observations by 1 hour suspecting a typo in the original paper.

718 1890 Sep. 30.7524 84

We decreased Δα by 2s due to inconsistency in original paper.

727 1890 Oct. 11.7805 999

Strömgren proposed to increase the date of the observation by 3 days, accepted.

750 1891 Jan. 14.1014 529

We decreased Δα by 4s due to the inconsistency in the original paper.

788 1891 Feb. 13.9258 999

We increased Δδ by 1' due to the inconsistency in the original paper,

864 1891 Apr. 10.0410 35

We increased Δα by 10s due to the inconsistency in the original paper.

872 1891 Apr. 27.8752 516

We changed a sign in Δδ suspecting a typo in the original paper.


≡